Menu:

 

 

Volume 22, Issue 4 - Dectember 2022

 

Download (647KB, PDF)

 

 

  • Abstract / Resumo
  • References / Bibliografia
  • Citations / Citações

Revista de Gestão Costeira Integrada
Volume 22, Issue 4, December 2022, Pages 273-284

DOI: 10.5894/rgci-n491
*Submission: 9 DEC 2021; Peer review: 4 JAN 2022; Revised: 29 NOV 2022; Accepted: 9 JAN 2023; Available on-line: 6 JUN 2023

Sistemas de Avaliação e Medidas de Desempenho no Setor Portuário: uma Análise Bibliométrica

Daiana Pedersini@ 1, Kassia Rodrigues1, Sergio Petri1, Sandra Ensslin1

@ Corresponding author: daianapedersini@hotmail.com.

1 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

RESUMO
A gestão é uma atividade cada vez mais demandada no setor portuário, sendo norteada pelas informações providas pelas medidas (indicadores) dos Sistemas de Avaliação de Desempenho (SADs). Nesse contexto, esta pesquisa tem por objetivo averiguar os estudos que fizeram uso de Sistemas de Avaliação de Desempenho e as características de suas medidas no setor portuário. Para tanto, foi feita uma análise bibliométrica com base em 33 artigos publicados na língua inglesa e selecionados nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science por meio do ProKnow-C. Constatou-se que (i) o tema vem merecendo atenção de pesquisadores, a partir de 2004, com foco na eficiência portuária que encontra alinhamento com os métodos Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) e Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) mais utilizados nos estudos; (ii) 50% dos estudos de Avaliação de Desempenho Portuário ocorreram em portos asiáticos, podendo ser justificados pela significativa participação desses portos no comércio exterior e pela insuficiência de ferrovias e rodovias para a movimentação de cargas nesse continente; (iii) 67% dos estudos fazem uso de instrumentos que agregam medidas/indicadores, possibilitando a compreensão global do desempenho, entretanto utilizam modelos de avaliação genéricos sem a participação das partes interessadas em sua concepção o que confirmou a inexistência de alinhamento dos indicadores usados com a estratégia organizacional podendo, assim, reduzir a utilidade dos modelos por alguns dos stakeholders considerarem o diagnóstico resultante pouco útil para gestão do contexto; e (iv) apenas 12% dos estudos fazem uso de instrumentos de avaliação de desempenho com o objetivo de subsidiar a atividade de gestão portuária. Como palavra final, os pesquisadores argumentam que o uso de modelos de avaliação personalizados, com base na participação de gestor(es), apresenta-se como um diferencial para a gestão portuária capaz de proporcionar sustentabilidade ao desempenho e à organização portuária.

Palavras-chave: Desempenho Portuário; Modelos de Avaliação; Indicadores; Análise Bibliométrica.

ABSTRACT
Management is an increasingly demanded activity in the port sector, guided by the information provided by the measures (indicators) of the Performance Evaluation Systems (PESs). In this context, this research aims to investigate the studies that made use of Performance Evaluation Systems and the characteristics of their measures in the port sector. To this end, a bibliometric analysis was performed based on 33 articles published in english and selected from the Scopus and Web of Science databases using ProKnow-C. It was found that (i) the topic has been attracting attention from researchers since 2004, with a focus on port efficiency, which is aligned with the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) methods most used in studies; (ii) 50% of the Port Performance Evaluation studies took place in Asian ports, which can be justified by the significant participation of these ports in foreign trade and the lack of railroads and highways for cargo handling in that continent; (iii) 67% of the studies make use of instruments that add measures/indicators, enabling a global understanding of performance, however they use generic evaluation models without the participation of interested parties in their design, which confirmed the lack of alignment of the indicators used with the organizational strategy may, therefore, reduce the usefulness of the models because some of the stakeholders consider the resulting diagnosis not very useful for managing the context; and (iv) only 12% of the studies make use of performance evaluation instruments with the objective of subsidizing the port management activity. As a final word, the researchers argue that the use of personalized evaluation models, based on the participation of the manager(s), presents itself as a differential for port management capable of providing sustainability to port performance and organization.

Keywords: Performance Evaluation; Performance Measures; Performance Indicators; Bibliometric Analysis.

 

Araújo, S. S.; Matos, L. S.; Ensslin, S. R. (2020). Compras públicas sob a perspectiva da Avaliação de Desempenho: uma revisão de literatura e agenda de pesquisa. Revista Gestão & Conexões, v. 9, n. 1, p. 99-127. DOI: 10.13071/regec.2317-5087.2020.9.1.27486.99-127.

Bang, H. S., Kang, H. W., Martin, J., & Woo, S. H. (2012). The impact of operational and strategic management on liner shipping efficiency: a two-stage DEA approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(7), 653-672. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.740165 [12]

Barros, C. P., Felício, J. A., & Fernandes, R. L. (2012). Productivity analysis of Brazilian seaports. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(5), 503-523. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.705033 [11]

Bergantino, A. S., Musso, E., & Porcelli, F. (2013). Port management performance and contextual variables: Which relationship? Methodological and empirical issues. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 39-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.002 [10]

Bichou, K. (2011). A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3(1), 6-26. DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.037817 [1]

Chang, V., & Tovar, B. (2014). Efficiency and productivity changes for Peruvian and Chilean ports terminals: A parametric distance functions approach. Transport Policy, 31, 83-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.11.007 [9]

Cheng, M. C., & Wang, J. J. (2016). An integrative approach in measuring hub-port supply chain performance: Potential contributions of a logistics and transport data exchange platform. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(2), 150-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2016.03.001 [27]

De Langen, P. W., & Heij, C. (2014). Corporatization and performance: A literature review and an analysis of the performance effects of the corporatization of Port of Rotterdam authority. Transport Reviews, 34(3), 396-414. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2014.905650 [6]

De Langen, P. W., & Sharypova, K. (2013). Intermodal connectivity as a port performance indicator. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.003 [28]

Dutra, A., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., Fillol, A. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 243-269. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2014-0015

Ensslin, L., Dezem, V., Dutra, A., Ensslin, S. R., & Somensi, K. (2018). Seaport-performance tools: an analysis of the international literature. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(4), 587-602. DOI: 10.1057/s41278-017-0083-7

Ensslin, L.; Giffhorn, E.; Ensslin, S. R.; Petri, S. M.; & Vianna, W. B. (2010). Avaliação do Desempenho de empresas terceirizadas com o uso da metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão-Construtivista. Revista Pesquisa Operacional, 30(1), 125-152. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-74382010000100007

Ensslin, S. R.. Rodrigues, K. T.; Yoshiura, L. J. M.; da Silva, J. C.; & Longaray, A. A. (2022). Organizational performance management and the ‘sustainability’ of the performance evaluation system: a view guided by the integrative review perspective. Sustainability, 14(17), 11005. DOI: 10.3390/su141711005

Ensslin, S. R.; Welter, L. M.; Pedersini, D. R. (2022). Performance evaluation: A comparative study between public and private sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1761-1785. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0146

Guener, S. (2018). Incorporating value judgments into port efficiency measurement models: insights from Turkish ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(4), 569-586. DOI: 10.1057/s41278-017-0062-z [26]

Ha, M. H., Yang, Z., & Lam, J. S. L. (2019). Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Transport Policy, 73, 25-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.021 [30]

Hales, D., Lee Lam, J. S., & Chang, Y. T. (2016). The balanced theory of port competitiveness. Transportation Journal, 55(2), 168-189. DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0168 [15]

Hamid, N. (2018a). Factor analysis for balanced scorecard as measuring competitive advantage of infrastructure assets of owned state ports in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 2, 386-401. DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-12-2016-0178 [24]

Hamid, N. (2018b). Use balanced scorecard for measuring competitive advantage of infrastructure assets of state-owned ports in Indonesia. Journal of Management Development, 37(2), 114-126. DOI: 10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0313 [33]

Hung, S. W., Lu, W. M., & Wang, T. P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 706-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.005 [4]

Ignasiak-Szulc, A., Juščius, V., & Bogatova, J. (2018). Economic Evaluation Model of Seaports’ Performance Outlining Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages. Engineering Economics, 29(5), 571-579. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.29.5.21363 [19]

Jang, H. M.; Park, H.; & Kim, S. Y. (2016). Efficiency Analysis of Major Container Ports in Asia: Using DEA and Shannon’s Entropy. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 1-6. [20]

Ju, S. M., & Liu, N. (2015). Efficiency and its influencing factors in port enterprises: empirical evidence from Chinese port-listed companies. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(6), 571-590. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2014.996621 [21]

Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3), 23-35. DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X

López-Bermúdez, B., Freire-Seoane, M. J., & González-Laxe, F. (2019). Efficiency and productivity of container terminals in Brazilian ports (2008–2017). Utilities Policy, 56, 82-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.11.006 [22]

Matos, L. D. S., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2019). Review on the Performance Measurement Systems Life Cycle. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(4), 939-959. DOI: 10.4335/17.4.939-959

Melnyk, S.A.; Bititci, U.; Platts, K.; Tobias, J.; & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Manag. Account. Res., 25, 173-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007

Munisamy, S., & Singh, G. (2011). Benchmarking the efficiency of Asian container ports. African Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 1397-1407. DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2019.94024 [3]

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-117. DOI: 10.1108/01443570510633639

Nguyen, H. O., Nguyen, H. V., Chang, Y. T., Chin, A. T., & Tongzon, J. (2016). Measuring port efficiency using bootstrapped DEA: the case of Vietnamese ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(5), 644-659. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1107922 [29]

Oh, H., Lee, S. W., & Seo, Y. J. (2018). The evaluation of seaport sustainability: The case of South Korea. Ocean & Coastal Management, 161, 50-56. DOI: 10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2018.04.028 [23]

Otley, D. (2001). Extending the boundaries of management accounting research: developing systems for performance management. The British Accounting Review, 33(3), 243-261. DOI: 10.1006/bare.2001.0168

Pagano, A. M., Wang, G. W., Sánchez, O. V., & Ungo, R. (2013). Impact of privatization on port efficiency and effectiveness: results from Panama and US ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(2), 100-115. DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.756589 [25]

Panayides, P. M., Lambertides, N., & Savva, C. S. (2011). The relative efficiency of shipping companies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(5), 681-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.01.001 [13]

Park, R. K., & De, P. (2015). An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. Port management, Maritime Economics & Logistic, 6, 273-292. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100094 [2]

Pedersini D. R., Ensslin, S. R. (2020). Os Estudos Empíricos Internacionais no Setor Público têm feito uso dos Sistemas de Avaliação de Desempenho em sua Plenitude? Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, V. 13 (1), 207-235. DOI: 10.19177/reen.v12e02019207-232

Pinto, M. M., Goldberg, D. J., & Cardoso, J. S. (2017). Benchmarking operational efficiency of port terminals using the OEE indicator. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 504-517. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2016.6 [16]

Ramachandran, M.; Fegade, V.; & Raichurkar, P. P. (2017). Strategy performance evaluation of a port organisation based on multi-criteria decision making using fuzzy logic method. NMIMS Management Review, 33, 27-34. [32]

Rezaei, J., van Wulfften Palthe, L., Tavasszy, L., Wiegmans, B., & van der Laan, F. (2019). Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an MCDA approach. Management Decision, 57(2), 396-417 DOI: 10.1108/MD-04-2018-0482 [31]

Schøyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2013). The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: A comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(2), 197-221. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2013.3 [14]

Schøyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2017). Comparing the productivity of Norwegian and some Nordic and UK container ports-an application of Malmquist productivity index. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 9(2), 234-256. DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2017.082526 [17]

Somensi, K., Ensslin, S., Dutra, A., Ensslin, L., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., & Dezem, V. (2017). Knowledge construction about port performance evaluation: An international literature analysis. Intangible Capital, 13(4), 720-744. DOI: 10.3926/ic.956

Tetteh, E. A., Yang, H. L., & Gomina Mama, F. (2016). Container ports throughput analysis: a comparative evaluation of China and five West African Countries’ seaports efficiencies. In International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa (Vol. 22, pp. 162-173). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.22.162 [18]

Thiel, G. G.; Ensslin, S. R.; & Ensslin, L. (2017). Street lighting management and performance evaluation: opportunities and challenges. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 15(2), 303-328. DOI: 10.4335/15.2.303-328

Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, L. (2016). Construção de conhecimento sobre Avaliação de Desempenho para gestão organizacional: uma investigação nas pesquisas científicas internacionais. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13(28), 123-148. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p123

Wanke, P. F., Barbastefano, R. G., & Hijjar, M. F. (2011). Determinants of efficiency at major Brazilian port terminals. Transport Reviews, 31(5), 653-677. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.547635 [8]

Welter, L. M.; & Ensslin, S. R. (2022). How do the unintended consequences of performance evaluation systems manifest themselves? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 509-528. DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0087

Wu, J., Yan, H., & Liu, J. (2010). DEA models for identifying sensitive performance measures in container port evaluation. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 12(3), 215-236. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2010.6 [7]

Wu, Y. C. J., & Goh, M. (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 1030-1042. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.01.002 [5]

 

em constru��o